![]() ![]() It wouldn't be all that bad if I had the option to freely unregister my game from Steam without going through so much red tape. I am greatly disappointed that I signed up for Steam and registered my ETS2 product key. Not only do they offer quick advice, explaining how easy it is to sign up and register the ETS2 game, but also just as quick is their criticism as they touch on accusations referring to pirated copies of the ETS2 game. What I find annoying, and some-what arrogant, is the constant feedback from some Steam users who seem to lack the ability of understanding that some people just may not share the same interests as them. Just like many of you have the freedom of choice to use the site, I too have the freedom of choice to not use the site. And it stays off my computer until the next time I really, really, really, MUST install it again to get something else. I install it ONLY to get what I want, then I go completely out of my way to get it back off my computer as quickly as possible. I keep my Steam uninstalled at all times while not using it. However, (despite my having a Steam account, and my ETS2 game registered there via product key), I must agree with the "non Steam" users who speak against the using of the Steam site. And of course, I respect your freedom to have this experience. ![]() For you, Steam seems to be a great place for you to visit, and enjoy. Reply Deleteįirst, I would like to say that I appreciate that many of you have an interest in the "Steam" site. Surely, you are releasing this paint job for free to encourage us to use World of Trucks, but I for one simply don't have any reason to use it beyond getting freebies when you guys offer them. That means I will definitely remove it (and therefore lose my only achievable achievement) as soon as I have my DLC. And this profile-filling achievement forces me to use a custom number plate, which I do not want to. That means all other achievements are completely unachievable for me. All your other achievements are about either screenshots or logging in frequently, and well, being not a particularly serious player of ETS2 who doesn't go crazy with mods, most of my screenshots have not even had a single view from anyone. ![]() Yes, I'll fill in my profile to get the paint job DLC, but afterwards I still will have absolutely zero incentive to log in. Dear SCS, you guys said quite a while ago that World of Trucks is going to be more than a screenshot site, but all this time has passed and it still seems to be little more than a screenshot depository. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() ![]() Have you ever heard about any bugs with painter photo-tracing tools? No, you probably didn’t - they have polished it so the dedicated photographic manipulators will pay their money and be happy with that. I’m not sure if that next generation paint technology is in works right now, or he isn’t allowed to develop it. Yep, it’s based, however, he could push it further. So … maybe Corel needs to begin listening a little more closely to its users? They might be about to lose their monopoly in this market?Īdobe never had bought moxi up, they had a very limited permission to use it Īnd it looks like we will never see actual moxi release, I suspect there’s some sort of fight between Nelson and university he was working as moxi developer. It concluded with the punch line, “We don’t care, we don’t have to, we’re the phone company!” There used to be a skit on Saturday Night Live that highlighted the telephone company. And as in this instance, it seems to treat its users with disdain.Īnd for quite some time, they’ve been the only show in town. It makes outrageous claims about some of what Painter can do with little evidence of results. If you do a search right here in CG Society Forums using the search terms “Moxi” or “Nelson Chu”, you will be presented with a delicious array of samples of how his program works.Ĭorel has, for way too long, allowed its users to languish with broken software and fixes that just never quite make it to market (like the one discussed in this thread). If you do a search on Adobe CS5, you will come across some of the features that will be included … paint brushes is one of them and I suspect it is based on Nelson’s work. That was 2006 … everyone thought Adobe was just going to sit on it and allow it to fade into obscurity. It was a smash hit and was quickly bought up by Adobe. You see … back in 2006, an obscure gentleman named Nelson Chu previewed a program called Moxi which is based on Chinese brush painting at the ACM conference. Wait until April of 2010 when Adobe comes out with CS5. I -really- dislike Corel’s lack of fixing their bugs. Several days later you’ll probably be doing it again. So close Painter, uncheck the box and restart it, plugging in the serial number yet again. Once it starts using Rosetta, you can then use Painter, but it’s slower. ![]() So you don’t HAVE Rosetta loaded, like many Mac users? THEN you have to google and download the latest 10.5.(insert latest update number)combo update, which upgrades the entire system (and you thought the automatic upgrade control panel was doing that, didn’t you silly?). Click on the box “Open using Rosetta,” then restart Painter. The REAL way to fix it, which Corel has said NOTHING about, is to use the “get info” command while the application’s name is selected in the finder. The obnoxious thing is that is has NOTHING to do with the installation and you can reinstall until the sun burns out without changing a thing. Please reinstall from the original source.” (Mac OS 10.5.5,6,7 and now 8.) The worst is the one that happens every few times the program opens, where it says “Error: 18 - Corel Paitner has encountered a problem. Please reinstall from the original source.”I’m an author of a PS and Painter book published by a major publisher, and Painter 11 absolutely drives me NUTS with its crashes. “Corel Painter has encountered a problem. What follows is the solution to the infamous Corel Painter 11 “reinstall” bug :banghead: for Mac OS X artists, i.e., Dear Corel, I want all the time back that I’ve wasted both troubleshooting your unstable product as well as time lost from having to clunk around your horrendous 1995 user experience. ![]() ![]() Then we’ll match the hash we created with the one that’s there in the handshake. We can take all possible passwords that can exists, and convert them to hash. ![]() Now there’s no direct way of getting the password out of the hash, and thus hashing is a robust protection method. This handshake has the hash of the password. When the client and the AP communicate in order to authenticate the client, they have a 4 way handshake that we can capture.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |